Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Indo-Scythian Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 75 BC - 65 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | King on horseback advancing right, depicted in full armour and bearing a lance couched forward; the horse is shown in profile with raised foreleg, conveying forward motion. The royal rider wears a crested or plumed helmet and body armour characteristic of Indo-Scythian equestrian iconography. A Greek legend encircles the design within the coin's border, naming the king in the genitive case. The execution is in the hammered relief style typical of late Indo-Greek and early Indo-Scythian coinage, with a somewhat irregular flan. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | BAΣIΛEωΣ BAΣIΛEΩN MEΓAΛOY ONΩNOY |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Vonones ruled jointly with his brother Spalahores in the contested Paropamisadae and Arachosia regions during a period when Indo-Scythian control was still consolidating against the remnants of Indo-Greek power. The co-regency itself is the historical curiosity here — joint issues naming both rulers are relatively uncommon in the series, and the arrangement likely reflects a pragmatic division of military and administrative authority rather than any formal constitutional structure.
Senior's die studies suggest limited production runs for this type, which aligns with its relative scarcity compared to issues of Azes I that followed within a generation.