See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Triskeles Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 101 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Variable alignment ↺
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Celticised laureate and bearded head of Zeus facing right, derived from Philip II Macedonian prototypes but rendered in a distinctly Celtic artistic idiom. The bold laurel wreath is composed of exaggerated, elongated oval leaves rendered in high relief with strong plastic modelling. The flowing hair and beard are depicted in characteristic Celtic swirling style, with bold comma-shaped curls and flame-like locks replacing the naturalistic treatment of the Greek original. The facial features are simplified and abstracted, with a prominent almond-shaped eye, a sharp nose, and stylised beard rendered as a series of pellets and volutes. The field is plain and unlettered.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The triskeles-type tetradrachms of the eastern Celtic world derive ultimately from Macedonian prototypes — Philip II issues in particular — that flooded into central Europe through trade, tribute, and mercenary pay during the 4th century BC. Over generations of local imitation, the original types were progressively abstracted, each die-cutter working from a coin rather than a living model, the imagery drifting further from its source with each copying.

Attribution within this series remains genuinely contested. Göbl's classification system brought order to the typology, but tribal assignment is largely impossible without hoard provenance data, which for this specific variety is sparse.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE