Tetradrachm - Menandros

İhraççı Antioch ad Meandrum
Yıl 90 BC - 60 BC
Tür Standard circulation coin
Değer Tetradrachm (4)
Para birimi Drachm
Bileşim Silver
Ağırlık 16.0 g
Çap 25.5 mm
Kalınlık
Şekil Round (irregular)
Teknik Hammered
Yönlendirme Variable alignment ↺
Gravürcü(ler)
Dolaşımda olduğu yıl
Referans(lar) HN Online#2067
Ön yüz açıklaması Head of Apollo facing right, wearing a laurel wreath and with a bow and a quiver over his shoulder.
Ön yüz yazısı
Ön yüz lejandı
Arka yüz açıklaması Zebu bull standing left, head facing. Name of the city above and name of the magistrate in exergue. All within maeander pattern border.
Arka yüz yazısı Greek
Arka yüz lejandı ANTIOXEΩN MENANΔPOΣ
Kenar
Darphane
Basma adedi ND (90 BC - 60 BC) - -
Numisquare Kimliği 2529272630
Ek bilgiler

Historical Context: This tetradrachm from Antioch ad Meandrum (90-60 BC) reflects a tumultuous Anatolian period. The city, in Caria, navigated waning Seleucid influence and rising Roman power, especially post-Mithridatic Wars. "Menandros" likely denotes a local magistrate, not the Indo-Greek king. This civic coinage signifies Antioch ad Meandrum's autonomy under Roman hegemony, vital for regional commerce during a complex political transition.

Artistry: The coin's design follows established Hellenistic numismatic traditions, likely from a skilled local workshop. Engravers are anonymous, but the stylistic school drew from broader Greek artistic currents, with regional interpretations. Typical tetradrachm designs feature a prominent deity's head, e.g., Apollo or Zeus, on the obverse, rendered with classical idealism. The reverse commonly displays a standing deity, civic emblem, or mythological scene, with the city's ethnic and magistrate's name, reflecting local identity.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a substantial 16.0 gg silver flan (25.5 mm), this tetradrachm exhibits robust Hellenistic characteristics. High-points for wear typically include the obverse portrait's highest relief areas (hair, brow, nose) and the reverse's raised limbs or drapery. Strike quality varies; well-centered examples show full details. Flan preparation was generally good, though minor imperfections or off-center strikes are not uncommon, impacting the overall technical grade.

×