Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Liegendem Achter Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Celticised laureate and bearded male head facing left, rendered in a highly stylised barbaric idiom derived from Macedonian prototypes. The hair is articulated with distinctive S-shaped curvilinear forms characteristic of La Tène Celtic artistic convention. The facial features are boldly modelled with pronounced plastic relief, exhibiting the abstracted, vigorous stylisation typical of Eastern European Celtic coinage of the 3rd century BC.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "Liegendem Achter" — lying figure-eight — type belongs to a poorly understood cluster of imitative Celtic silver coinage derived ultimately from Macedonian prototypes, most likely Philip II tetradrachms filtered through successive regional copying. The issuing group remains unattributed to any specific tribe with confidence, which itself reflects how fragmented Celtic monetary production was across the Carpathian basin during this century.

The Kostial and Göbl references place this piece within a narrow die-linked variant group, the "var." notation signaling it deviates from the closest parallel — likely in the figure-eight rendering itself, where individual die cutters introduced idiosyncratic distortions as the prototype receded further from living memory.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT