Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Kugelwange Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A horse prancing vigorously to the left, rendered in the distinctive abstracted Celtic artistic style with a prominently globular, swollen body characteristic of the Kugelwange series. A pellet-in-annulet symbol occupies the upper field above the horse. Additional pellets and small abstract devices are scattered in the lower field beneath the horse. The mane is suggested by a curved row of pellets arching over the horse's back, and a spiral or crescent motif appears in the upper right field. The overall composition reflects the progressive Celtic transformation of the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm prototype.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

The Kugelwange — literally "ball cheek" — designation refers to the distinctive bulging facial treatment that emerged as Celtic die-cutters progressively abstracted their Macedonian prototype over successive generations of copying. This is not decline; it is deliberate stylization, a visual language increasingly detached from its source. The precise issuing group remains unattributed, somewhere in the arc of territory spanning the middle Danube basin, where multiple Celtic tribes operated parallel mint traditions with no centralizing authority.

Kostial 464 and Göbl's plate reference place this squarely within a well-documented typological sequence, though individual die attribution at this level of the series remains difficult.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT