Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 400 BC - 200 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Laureate head of Zeus facing right, rendered in a bold Celtic interpretation of the Macedonian prototype. The hair falls in thick, stylized waves behind the neck, and the laurel wreath is rendered with pronounced, leaf-like elements. The beard is depicted with simplified, pellet-accented curls, and the facial features — including a prominent brow and strong jaw — reflect the characteristic abstraction of Eastern Celtic die-cutting. The overall style retains recognizable Hellenistic influence while exhibiting the plastic, schematized quality typical of Celtic coinage derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachms. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
This type belongs to the broad tradition of Celtic coinage derived from the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm, but the "Faithful Legend" designation marks it as an unusually conservative imitation — one that retained legible traces of the original Greek inscription long after most Celtic die-cutters had reduced it to abstract decoration. That restraint in abstraction likely places it earlier within the typological sequence, though the two-century attribution window reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty about the tribal origin and precise region of production.