Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 200 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Laureate head of Zeus facing right, rendered in a bold Celtic interpretation of the Macedonian prototype. The hair falls in thick, stylized waves behind the neck, and the laurel wreath is rendered with pronounced, leaf-like elements. The beard is depicted with simplified, pellet-accented curls, and the facial features — including a prominent brow and strong jaw — reflect the characteristic abstraction of Eastern Celtic die-cutting. The overall style retains recognizable Hellenistic influence while exhibiting the plastic, schematized quality typical of Celtic coinage derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachms. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
This type belongs to the broad tradition of Celtic coinage derived from the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm, but the "Faithful Legend" designation marks it as an unusually conservative imitation — one that retained legible traces of the original Greek inscription long after most Celtic die-cutters had reduced it to abstract decoration. That restraint in abstraction likely places it earlier within the typological sequence, though the two-century attribution window reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty about the tribal origin and precise region of production.