See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Faithful Legend Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 400 BC - 200 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Laureate head of Zeus facing right, rendered in a bold Celtic interpretation of the Macedonian prototype. The hair falls in thick, stylized waves behind the neck, and the laurel wreath is rendered with pronounced, leaf-like elements. The beard is depicted with simplified, pellet-accented curls, and the facial features — including a prominent brow and strong jaw — reflect the characteristic abstraction of Eastern Celtic die-cutting. The overall style retains recognizable Hellenistic influence while exhibiting the plastic, schematized quality typical of Celtic coinage derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachms.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

This type belongs to the broad tradition of Celtic coinage derived from the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm, but the "Faithful Legend" designation marks it as an unusually conservative imitation — one that retained legible traces of the original Greek inscription long after most Celtic die-cutters had reduced it to abstract decoration. That restraint in abstraction likely places it earlier within the typological sequence, though the two-century attribution window reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty about the tribal origin and precise region of production.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE