Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Dacian tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A heavily stylised rider on horseback advancing to the left, the figure and mount reduced to schematic Celtic abstract forms derived from the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm reverse type. A wreath motif appears above the horse, while vestiges of a branch or vegetal ornament are discernible below the horse's body. The rider's anatomy is highly abstracted, with limbs rendered as geometric lines, consistent with the progressive barbarisation typical of Dacian imitative coinage. The field is plain and uninscribed, with no exergual line or legend present. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Dacian imitations of Macedonian tetradrachms proliferated rapidly after Philip II's campaigns brought vast quantities of Macedonian silver into the Carpathian basin. Local tribes absorbed the coinage, then began striking their own interpretations — progressively more abstracted with each generation of dies, as engravers copied copies rather than originals. The Apollokopf-Dickschrötling type takes its name from the thick flan format, a deliberate departure from Macedonian proportions that may reflect indigenous weight standards or simply different planchet preparation habits.
Attribution to specific tribes remains unresolved. The Göbl and Kostial references catalogue die varieties rather than issuers, since no surviving inscription or find hoard has conclusively tied this type to a named group.