See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Apollokopf-Dickschrötling Type

Issuer Uncertain Dacian tribes
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A heavily stylised rider on horseback advancing to the left, the figure and mount reduced to schematic Celtic abstract forms derived from the Philip II Macedonian tetradrachm reverse type. A wreath motif appears above the horse, while vestiges of a branch or vegetal ornament are discernible below the horse's body. The rider's anatomy is highly abstracted, with limbs rendered as geometric lines, consistent with the progressive barbarisation typical of Dacian imitative coinage. The field is plain and uninscribed, with no exergual line or legend present.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Dacian imitations of Macedonian tetradrachms proliferated rapidly after Philip II's campaigns brought vast quantities of Macedonian silver into the Carpathian basin. Local tribes absorbed the coinage, then began striking their own interpretations — progressively more abstracted with each generation of dies, as engravers copied copies rather than originals. The Apollokopf-Dickschrötling type takes its name from the thick flan format, a deliberate departure from Macedonian proportions that may reflect indigenous weight standards or simply different planchet preparation habits.

Attribution to specific tribes remains unresolved. The Göbl and Kostial references catalogue die varieties rather than issuers, since no surviving inscription or find hoard has conclusively tied this type to a named group.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE