See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm

Issuer Uncertain Bactrian city (Baktria)
Year 261 BC - 238 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter 25 mm
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Standing owl facing, depicted in the canonical Athenian style with large forward-facing eyes rendered as concentric circles, feathered body covered with pellet-detailed plumage, and taloned feet gripping a ground line. An olive sprig with two leaves and a berry appears to the upper left. The ethnic legend AOE is inscribed to the right of the owl in three lines, reading downward. The composition closely imitates the classic Athenian New Style or earlier owl tetradrachm type, reflecting the widespread use of Athenian monetary iconography in Bactrian coinage of the Hellenistic period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering ΑΘΕ
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The window between 261 and 238 BC in Bactria is murky by any standard — this is the transitional period between Seleucid administrative control and the breakaway kingdom established under Diodotus I, who effectively declared independence from Antiochus II sometime around 255–250 BC. Coins attributed to uncertain Bactrian mints from this stretch often blur the line between late Seleucid provincial issues and the earliest autonomous Bactrian strikes, which is precisely why the issuing authority here remains unresolved.

The Syros 18–19 reference places this piece within a recognized but contentious grouping — scholars continue to debate whether these issues preceded or immediately followed the formal break with the Seleucids.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE