Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Caria, Achaemenid Satrapy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 350 BC - 340 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (350 BC - 340 BC) |
| Additional information |
Caria occupied an awkward political position in the mid-fourth century: nominally an Achaemenid satrapy, yet governed by the Hecatomnid dynasty with a degree of autonomy that made its coinage policy effectively independent. The satrap Mausolus — whose tomb gave us the word "mausoleum" — aggressively expanded Carian influence across the Aegean during the 360s and 350s, and the tetradrachm series from this period reflects a local mint operating with Persian tolerance rather than Persian direction.
The weight standard here follows Rhodian or "light Chian" conventions rather than Attic, a deliberate choice that facilitated trade with Aegean island networks under Hecatomnid influence.