Katalog
| Emittent | Amisos |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 5.1 g |
| Durchmesser | 20 mm |
| Dicke | 2 mm |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | SNG BM Black Sea#1177-1191, GCV#3642 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Gorgoneion on aegis (shield). |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Nike advancing right, holding wreath and palm branch. |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende |
ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 2903984890 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, a barbaric imitation from Amisos, dates to 85-65 BC, a tumultuous period dominated by the Third Mithridatic War. Mithridates VI Eupator, the formidable king of Pontus, was locked in a desperate struggle against Rome. Such imitations often arose from the exigencies of war, where central mints were disrupted, or local authorities, perhaps even Roman-allied cities, needed to produce currency quickly. This coin reflects the widespread influence of Mithridates' coinage and the economic pressures of his prolonged conflict.
Artistry: While no specific engraver is identifiable for this "barbaric" issue, the stylistic school attempts to emulate the Hellenistic Pontic prototypes of Mithridates VI. The original design would typically feature a heroic portrait of the king, often with flowing hair and a diadem, sometimes resembling Alexander the Great or Perseus. The "barbaric" nature manifests in cruder execution: simplified facial features, less refined hair detail, and a generally less sophisticated artistic hand, deviating from the high standards of official royal mints.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan weighing 5.1 grams and measuring 20 millimeters, this tetrachalkon's technical qualities would likely be inconsistent. High-points for wear or weak strikes would typically include the king's hair, nose, and diadem on the obverse, and any intricate reverse details (e.g., Pegasus wings or star points). Given its "barbaric" classification, one might expect off-center strikes, irregular flan shapes, and potentially weak or uneven pressure, reflecting hurried production rather than meticulous craftsmanship.