Katalog
| İhraççı | Amisos |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 8.87 g |
| Çap | 21 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | SNG BM Black Sea#1209, HGC 7#243, Malloy#26g |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Wreathed head of Mithradates VI as young Dionysos right. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Panther skin and thyrsos on cista mystica; to left and right of cista, monograms. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı |
ΑΜΙΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 6711702210 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: The Amisos Tetrachalkon, dated 85-65 BC, reflects the intense struggle of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus, against the Roman Republic. This period encompasses his resurgence and ultimate decline in the Mithridatic Wars. As a crucial Pontic city and royal mint, Amisos issued such bronze coinage to finance Mithridates' extensive military campaigns and maintain local commerce. These issues underscore the economic pressures and strategic importance of the region during a pivotal era of conflict.
Artistry: Though the engraver is unknown, this coin exemplifies high Hellenistic artistic standards. Mithridates VI, a philhellene, used Greek conventions to legitimize his rule. Obverse designs commonly feature a heroic or deified portrait, often Ares or Perseus, rendered with strong classical lines and idealized features. The reverse typically displays a civic or royal emblem, such as a sword in a scabbard or a cista mystica, executed with notable detail, showcasing the mint's skilled artisans.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Tetrachalkon (8.87g, 21mm) exhibits typical characteristics. High points prone to wear include the obverse portrait's helmet crest, nose, and cheekbone, and raised reverse elements like a sword hilt or cista lid. Technical strike quality varies; well-struck examples show full detail, good centering, and minimal flan imperfections. However, off-center strikes, minor planchet flaws, and weak areas are common, reflecting the high-volume wartime production demands.