Catalog
| Issuer | Amisos |
|---|---|
| Year | 125 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 8.3 g |
| Diameter | 20 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | SNG BM Black Sea#1139, SNG Copenhagen#138, SNG Levante#6729, SNG Stancomb#671 |
| Obverse description | Bust of Artemis, right. Bow and quiver over shoulder. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Tripod |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering |
ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| Edge | Rough |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (125 BC - 100 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2379251250 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon from Amisos, dated 125-100 BC, places it within the formative years of Mithridates VI Eupator's reign as King of Pontus. During this period, Mithridates consolidated power and expanded influence along the Black Sea, transforming Pontus into a formidable Hellenistic kingdom. Amisos, a vital port, served as a key economic and strategic center, its minting reflecting the king's growing authority and regional prosperity before his major conflicts with Rome.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, the coin exemplifies the vibrant Hellenistic stylistic tradition of Asia Minor. The obverse typically features a dynamic portrait of Mithridates VI, often idealized as a deity like Dionysus, characterized by flowing hair and a heroic expression, reflecting his self-identification with divine patrons. The reverse frequently depicts a mythological figure or symbol relevant to local cults or Pontic dynastic claims, executed with robust, sculptural quality typical of the era.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (8.3 grams, 20 millimeters), this tetrachalkon exhibits characteristic features of ancient bronze coinage. High points on the obverse usually include the hair, brow, and nose of the portrait, while the reverse's raised elements are also vulnerable to wear. Technical strike quality can vary, with some examples showing minor off-centering or areas of weakness, particularly in peripheries, due to the striking process and die wear. Flan integrity and surface condition are critical grading factors.