Tetrachalkon - Mithridates VI

Emittent Amisos
Jahr 85 BC - 65 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Tetrachalkon (1⁄12)
Währung Drachm
Material Bronze
Gewicht 9.03 g
Durchmesser 21 mm
Dicke
Form Round (irregular)
Prägetechnik Hammered
Ausrichtung Variable alignment ↺
Stempelschneider
Im Umlauf bis
Referenz(en) SNG BM Black Sea#1205-1207, HGC 7#243, SNG Stancomb#698, Malloy#26c
Aversbeschreibung Wreathed head of Mithradates VI as young Dionysos right.
Aversschrift
Averslegende
Reversbeschreibung Panther skin and thyrsos on cista mystica; to left, monogram of HTPK.
Reversschrift Greek
Reverslegende ΑΜΙΣΟΥ
(Translation: Amisos)
Rand
Prägestätte
Auflage ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - -
Numisquare-ID 1584217630
Zusätzliche Informationen

Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, issued by Mithridates VI Eupator from Amisos between 85-65 BC, encapsulates a critical period in the Mithridatic Wars against the Roman Republic. Amisos, a pivotal Pontic city, served as a strategic mint during Mithridates' desperate struggle to maintain his kingdom's independence. This coinage funded his protracted military campaigns, reflecting the immense political and economic pressures he faced while resisting Roman expansion in Asia Minor.

Artistry: The coin's artistry, though from an anonymous engraver, adheres to the late Hellenistic style prevalent in Pontus. The obverse typically features a dynamic portrait of Mithridates VI, often idealized to convey his powerful persona, or a deity such as Dionysus, with whom he was associated. The reverse commonly depicts an eagle standing left on a thunderbolt, symbolizing divine power and imperial authority, or a prominent star and crescent, a dynastic emblem of the Mithridatids. These designs are executed with characteristic Hellenistic realism and dramatic emphasis.

Technical/Grading: As a bronze issue, this Tetrachalkon (9.03 gg, 21 mm) exhibits typical technical qualities. High-points on the obverse portrait include the hair and facial features, while on the reverse, the eagle's breast and wings are most susceptible to wear. Strike quality can vary, often showing some off-centering or uneven pressure, potentially affecting legends or design elements. The cast planchet may present minor irregularities. For grading, the sharpness of the strike, surface preservation, and the development of an attractive, stable patina are paramount.

×