Katalog
| İhraççı | Venusia (Apulia) |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 215 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Quadrans (1/4) |
| Para birimi | Nummus (circa 275-200 BC) |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 41.56 g |
| Çap | 36 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Cast |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HN Italy#711 , ICC 1979#293 , Weber#478 , BMC Gr/It#8 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Scallop shell. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Three crescents; above, VE ligate. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (-215) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 2252597530 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: Issued by Venusia in Apulia in 215 BC, this Æ Teruncius reflects the profound crisis of the Second Punic War. Following Cannae (216 BC), Venusia, a strategic Roman colony, faced immense economic and logistical pressures. The minting of substantial bronze coinage underscores the urgent need for local currency to sustain daily commerce and military provisions amidst Hannibal's presence. These issues highlight Roman colonial resilience in maintaining economic stability during existential conflict.
Artistry: Specific engravers for these utilitarian wartime bronzes are rarely identifiable. The Æ Teruncius typically exhibits a blend of indigenous Italic and Hellenistic stylistic influences. Designs, often robust and functional, would feature prominent deities or symbolic representations pertinent to Roman authority or local identity. The obverse might show a deity head, with a relevant symbol or figure on the reverse, alongside the distinctive three-pellet mark of value. Artistry prioritized clear communication of value, reflecting production exigencies.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 41.56 grams and 36 millimeters, this substantial bronze flan presented challenges for consistent striking. High-points susceptible to wear include highest relief areas of depicted deities' hair, facial features, or drapery folds, and prominent reverse elements. Technical strike qualities often vary, with minor off-centering, weak strike areas, or flan irregularities being common due to rapid wartime production. A well-preserved example would exhibit a strong strike, good centering, and an attractive, stable patina.