Katalog
| İhraççı | Shaybanid Local Issuers (Bukhara) |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 1551-1557 |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Tanka (1) |
| Para birimi | Tanka |
| Bileşim | Silver |
| Ağırlık | 4.65 g |
| Çap | |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | Album Islamic#3004 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Inscription with ruler`s name in central square cartouche, and surrounding. Countermarked `adl burhan khan on tanka of early Shaybanid rulers |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | Persian (nastaliq) |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Inscription with date and mint name in central square cartouche and surrounding |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Persian |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (1551-1557) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 1631353700 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This silver Tanka, issued by Shaybanid local authorities in Bukhara (1551-1557), is distinguished by the countermark of Burhan Sayyid. Countermarking was a common method for new or local rulers to assert authority and legitimize currency without extensive new minting. This countermark signifies Burhan Sayyid's control over Bukhara, a pivotal Central Asian hub, amidst the broader Shaybanid dynastic influence.
Artistry: The original Tanka's design adhered to Shaybanid Islamic calligraphic traditions, featuring elegant Naskh or Thuluth script for religious legends and ruler's titles. The countermark, a distinct punch, typically presented Burhan Sayyid's name and possibly a regnal epithet within a geometric cartouche. Its artistic merit lies in its clarity and precise application, effectively overlaying a new authority's visual identity onto the host coin.
Technical/Grading: Key grading considerations for this 4.65 gram silver Tanka focus on the clarity and completeness of the Burhan Sayyid countermark. A well-struck countermark, showing all its legends distinctly, is paramount. The underlying host coin's details, particularly visible mint and date around the countermark, also contribute to its technical assessment. Weak strikes, off-center application, or excessive flattening of the host coin's original design would diminish its numismatic appeal.