Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth |
|---|---|
| Year | 1636 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | First Zloty (1573-1795) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1636 - Kopicki 7103 Punch 1 - 1636 - Kopicki 7103 Punch 2 - 1636 - Kopicki 7103 Punch 3 - |
| Additional information |
Elbląg was a Prussian city under Polish suzerainty, and its mint operated under a complex arrangement that granted the town considerable autonomy in coinage — a concession wrested through decades of commercial negotiation with the Crown. Władysław IV, perpetually short of war funds and eyeing both Muscovy and the Ottomans, had strong incentive to keep Prussian merchant cities cooperative. The talar format here was driven by Baltic trade demands: Hanseatic partners expected coins that matched the weight standards of the Reichstaler.
Davenport's EC II classification places this alongside a distinct sequence of Polish-Prussian issues rather than the main Commonwealth talar series — a taxonomic distinction that still generates debate among specialists working the Kopicki references.