Catálogo
| Emisor | Tripoli, Regency of |
|---|---|
| Año | 1575 |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | Sultani (8) |
| Moneda | Akçe (1551-1687) |
| Composición | Gold |
| Peso | 3.42 g |
| Diámetro | 19 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | |
| Orientación | |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | A#1332, Artuk#1635 var, Pere#282 var |
| Descripción del anverso | |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | Arabic |
| Leyenda del anverso | |
| Descripción del reverso | |
| Escritura del reverso | Arabic |
| Leyenda del reverso | |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
982 (1575) - ٩٨٢ Thick legends (Damali 12-TR-A4b) - 982 (1575) - ٩٨٢ Thin legends (Damali 12-TR-A4a) - |
| ID de Numisquare | 4558120950 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: This Sultani, issued in 1575 from the Ottoman Regency of Tripoli, dates to the reign of Sultan Murad III (1574-1595). Its production in a North African regency highlights the vast reach and administrative control of the Ottoman Empire at its peak. Tripoli was a crucial strategic and commercial hub; this high-value gold currency facilitated trade across the Mediterranean and within Ottoman territories, reflecting Istanbul's economic integration and political authority.
Artistry: The design adheres to established Ottoman numismatic tradition, prioritizing elegant Arabic calligraphy. While engravers are rarely named, the artistry reflects skilled calligraphers or mint masters who meticulously rendered the Sultan's name and titles, often incorporating the imperial tughra, on one side. The reverse typically bears religious inscriptions, the mint name (Tripoli), and the Hegira date (982 AH). The "type 1" designation suggests a specific arrangement or minor variation in legends.
Technical/Grading: Struck in gold, this 3.42 gram, 19 mm Sultani typically exhibits a careful strike, though variations occur. High-points susceptible to wear include the intricate flourishes of the calligraphy, the outer margins of the legends, and any decorative borders. A well-struck example presents full, crisp legends with clear diacritics and a well-centered design on a generally round planchet. Weakness in strike or off-centering can diminish readability and impact its numismatic grade.