Catalogue
| Émetteur | Algiers, Regency of |
|---|---|
| Année | 1575 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | 1 Sultani (4.5) |
| Devise | Budju (1517-1848) |
| Composition | Gold |
| Poids | 3.4 g |
| Diamètre | |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | Fr#9 |
| Description de l’avers | Cezayir/Jaza`ir (Algiers) mint Inscription |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | Arabic |
| Légende de l’avers | Dareba fi Cezayir |
| Description du revers | |
| Écriture du revers | Arabic |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
982 (1575) - ٩٨٢ - |
| ID Numisquare | 2215571520 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: Murad III's reign (1574-1595) marked the Ottoman Empire's territorial peak, alongside burgeoning internal challenges. Algiers, an Ottoman regency, was a crucial Mediterranean naval and corsair hub, strategically vital to imperial power. This 1575 Sultani from Algiers signifies its integration into the broader Ottoman monetary system, reflecting both imperial authority and the local mint's economic role within this key province. These standard gold coins facilitated extensive trade and military expenses across the empire.
Artistry: Artistry on this Sultani adheres to the established Ottoman Islamic epigraphic tradition, prioritizing calligraphic elegance over figural representation. The engraver, typical of the era, remains anonymous. The design prominently features the elaborate tughra and titles of Sultan Murad III on the obverse, accompanied by the mint name "Cezayir" (Algiers) and the Hijri date. The reverse typically bears the Kalima or other pious inscriptions, all rendered in a refined Naskh or Thuluth script, embodying the Sultan's divine legitimacy and the Islamic identity of the state.
Technical/Grading: As a hammered gold coin of 3.4 grams, this Sultani's technical strike qualities are inherently variable. High-points susceptible to wear or weakness would include the raised elements of the calligraphy, particularly the intricate flourishes of the tughra and any outer dotted borders. A well-preserved example would exhibit full, legible legends on both sides, with minimal evidence of strike weakness in the central or peripheral areas. Given the 16th-century minting process, common technical observations include irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and minor planchet flaws.