Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Sint Maarten |
|---|---|
| Year | 1820 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Billon |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
When French Guiana's copper-billon stuivers flooded the Caribbean in the early nineteenth century, colonial administrators on Sint Maarten faced the familiar problem of authenticating foreign specie for local circulation. The dual countermark — combining a C20 denomination stamp with a fleur-de-lis — was applied by Dutch colonial authority around 1820 specifically to validate these so-called Cayenne stuivers, originally struck in Cayenne for French Guianese use, as accepted currency on the Dutch half of the island.
The absence of a KM number reflects how thinly documented this issue remains in mainstream references. Scholten and the CNO catalogue it; most others don't.