目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | Highly stylised Celtic abstract design derived from a disintegrated laureate head, rendered in the characteristic British Iron Age manner. The field is dominated by a bold cruciform arrangement of opposed crescents at centre, flanked by four radiating groups of elongated pellets and comma-shaped elements forming a pinwheel-like composition. Numerous relief pellets and lentoid motifs fill the surrounding field, while the overall design retains no legible figural imagery, being entirely resolved into geometric and curvilinear abstraction. No legend or inscription appears on this face. The striking is characteristically irregular, with die-axis shift visible at the flan edges. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | A stylised Celtic horse prancing to the right occupies the central field, its body rendered with flowing lines and the characteristic disjointed anatomy of late British Iron Age coinage. Above the horse, a large lunate arc with a pellet-tipped appendage is flanked by a fan-shaped or solar motif to the upper left and a leaf-shaped element to the upper right. Scattered pellets and annulets fill the field around the horse. Beneath the horse, a prominent spoked wheel with eight spokes is depicted, a distinctive feature of the Wonersh type, accompanied by additional annulets and pellet ornaments in the lower field. No inscription is present. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The Wonersh type takes its name from the Surrey findspot where early examples came to light, and it belongs to the prolific uninscribed coinage produced by the Atrebates and Regini before Roman contact imposed dynastic naming conventions on British issues. These tribes controlled a broad swathe of southern Britain — roughly Hampshire, Sussex, and Berkshire — and their gold staters circulated across a network of elite exchange rather than everyday commerce. Precise attribution within the uninscribed series remains contested; die-link studies have tightened chronologies somewhat, but the forty-year production window reflects genuine uncertainty rather than an unusually long mint run.