See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Stater - Ura

Issuer Lycia, Dynasts of
Year 480 BC - 460 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Silver Stater (2)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Forepart of a roaring lion facing left, rendered in bold archaic relief, with the beast's open jaws prominently displaying teeth and a curling tongue. The lion's mane is elaborately depicted with a series of fine parallel wavy lines cascading along the neck and shoulder. The musculature of the chest and forequarters is rendered with vigorous stylization characteristic of early Lycian coinage. The design fills the flan with dynamic energy, the lion's head turned slightly downward in an aggressive posture. No legend or inscription appears on the obverse.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Lycian
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Ura was a coastal city in eastern Lycia, and its dynastic coinage from this period predates the region's absorption into the Achaemenid satrapal system that would later standardize much of Anatolian mint output. These early Lycian staters are among the most idiosyncratic issues of the Greek world — struck on a local weight standard derived neither from the Aeginetan nor the Attic system, but from a Lycian norm hovering around 9.6g that persisted stubbornly through successive dynastic regimes. Müseler's corpus remains the primary reference precisely because so few of these pieces entered major 19th-century collections, leaving them underrepresented in earlier scholarship.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE