Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Ionian city |
|---|---|
| Year | 550 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (-550) |
| Additional information |
The attribution of this piece to an uncertain Ionian mint reflects a broader problem in early Greek numismatics: the cities of western Anatolia adopted coinage in the late seventh and early sixth centuries BC without consistently identifying themselves as issuers. Lydia's influence was decisive — the technology and the metal both flowed outward from Sardis — but individual poleis adapted the medium independently, producing types that resist clean attribution even after a century of scholarship.
The Rosen collection, assembled by Jonathan Rosen and studied extensively before its dispersal, remains one of the principal reference points for archaic electrum precisely because it gathered so many of these unresolved attributions in one place.