Stater

Emittent Arados
Jahr 348 BC - 338 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Silver Stater (3)
Währung Drachm
Material Silver
Gewicht 10.64 g
Durchmesser 16 mm
Dicke
Form Round (irregular)
Prägetechnik Hammered
Ausrichtung Variable alignment ↺
Stempelschneider
Im Umlauf bis
Referenz(en) DCA#752
Aversbeschreibung Head of marine deity right, wearing laurel wreath.
Aversschrift
Averslegende
Reversbeschreibung Galley right above waves; Aramaic MA N and ||| || (date).
Reversschrift Aramaic
Reverslegende
Rand
Prägestätte
Auflage ND (348 BC - 338 BC) - -
Numisquare-ID 7733615680
Zusätzliche Informationen

Historical Context: This silver stater was issued by the autonomous Phoenician city-state of Arados between 348 and 338 BC. This era falls within the late Achaemenid Persian Empire's suzerainty, a period of significant economic prosperity and maritime dominance for Arados in the eastern Mediterranean. As a vital trading hub, Arados maintained the right to mint its own coinage, reflecting its commercial strength and political independence before Alexander the Great. The stater underscores the city's robust economy and strategic importance.

Artistry: While specific engravers are unrecorded, the coin’s artistry reflects a sophisticated blend of local Phoenician iconography and late classical Greek stylistic influences. The obverse typically features a marine deity, such as Melqart or Dagon, riding a hippocampus, symbolizing Arados's naval power. The reverse frequently depicts a galley, a warship emblematic of the city's maritime prowess, often accompanied by Phoenician letters identifying the mint. The designs are executed with a robust, yet refined, hand, showcasing high-quality die engraving.

Technical/Grading: Weighing 10.64 grams and struck on a compact 16 mm flan, this stater exhibits a distinctive dumpy fabric. Key high-points for wear include the deity’s head and torso, the hippocampus’s head and fin on the obverse, and the mast and stern details of the galley on the reverse. A well-struck example would show clear rendering of these elements, along with finer details of the deity’s attributes and the galley’s rigging. Assessment should consider strike centering, die wear, and flan irregularities common to issues of this period.

×