| Emitent | Chios |
|---|---|
| Rok | 500 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Stater (20) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Electrum |
| Waga | 14.05 g |
| Średnica | |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientacja | |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | Baldwin La#6, Jameson#1520a, Rosen#605, GCV#3572, Mavrogordato#23 |
| Opis awersu | Sphinx seated right, wearing round earring and stephane, raising left foreleg. A spiral tendril extends from head. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Quadripartite incuse square. |
| Pismo rewersu | |
| Legenda rewersu | |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (-500) - Circa 500 BC - |
| ID Numisquare | 1019954610 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This electrum stater from Chios, c. 500 BC, marks a pivotal era for the prosperous Ionian island. Strategically vital for maritime trade, Chios thrived on wine exports and naval strength. Its adoption of electrum coinage, a natural alloy, underscores its economic prominence and engagement with early monetary systems, influenced by Lydian innovation. This issue precedes the Ionian Revolt, reflecting Chios's autonomy and commercial growth before Persian influence reshaped the Aegean.
Artistry: The Chian sphinx iconography, a local emblem, exemplifies Archaic Greek artistry, specifically the Ionian school. No individual engraver is known for this early period; consistent rendering suggests a master die-cutter. The style displays Archaic attention to pattern and detail in the sphinx’s stylized wings, intricate coiffure, and powerful leonine body. This rigidity is typical of the era, predating Classical naturalism.
Technical/Grading: For this Chian electrum stater, key grading high-points include the sphinx’s complete head, especially eyes, muzzle, and individual mane strands. Definition of wing feathers, foreleg musculature, and tail are also crucial. On the reverse, clarity and depth of the incuse square or punch mark are important. Overall strike quality, centering on the flan, and absence of significant planchet flaws heavily influence grade, given the period's rudimentary striking methods.