Catalog
| Issuer | Marion |
|---|---|
| Year | 315 BC - 312 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 2.98 g |
| Diameter | 15 mm |
| Thickness | 1 mm |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | BMC Greek#6 |
| Obverse description | Head of Aphrodite right, wearing myrtle-wreath. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Ankh with pellet in ring: the whole in wreath. |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (315 BC - 312 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2863964260 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Æ issue belongs to Stasioikos II, the final king of Marion, a Cypriot city-kingdom, minted 315-312 BC. This period was marked by the turbulent Diadochi Wars, with Cyprus a strategic prize contested by Antigonos I Monophthalmos and Ptolemy I Soter. Stasioikos II's alliance with Antigonos ultimately led to Marion's destruction by Ptolemy in 312 BC. Such bronze coinage underscores the king's assertion of sovereignty and the practical need for fractional currency amidst intense geopolitical flux.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for bronze issues of this era. The coin's artistry reflects Cypriot numismatic tradition, influenced by early Hellenistic styles. The obverse likely depicted a prominent deity, perhaps Apollo or Aphrodite, rendered robustly for a small flan. The reverse would feature a civic or royal emblem, like a lyre or quiver, or a royal monogram. The design prioritized legibility and clear identification over intricate detail, blending local conventions with broader Hellenistic aesthetics.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 2.98 grams and 15 millimeters, this bronze coin is a small, utilitarian module. High-points prone to wear include the hair, nose, and chin of any obverse portrait, and the raised elements of the reverse device. Technical strike quality varied; flans were often less meticulously prepared, leading to irregularities. Strikes could be less forceful or off-center, resulting in areas of flatness. A superior example would exhibit a relatively full design on a compact, well-centered flan.