Solidus - Moneyer Landegisilus Huy

Emitent Austrasia, Kingdom of
Rok 585-625
Typ Standard circulation coin
Hodnota 1 Solidus
Měna Tremissis (476-670)
Složení Gold
Hmotnost 4.18 g
Průměr
Tloušťka
Tvar Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered
Orientace Variable alignment ↺
Rytci
V oběhu do
Reference Prou Mer#1199 , Delmonte G#20 , Belfort#1530
Popis líce Diademed bust right.
Písmo líce Latin
Opis líce CHOAE FIT
(Translation: Minted in Huy.)
Popis rubu Cross standing on globe.
Písmo rubu Latin
Opis rubu LANDIGISILOS MO
(Translation: Moneyer Landegisilus.)
Hrana
Mincovna
Náklad ND (585-625) - -
ID Numisquare 7321840910
Další informace

Historical Context: This Solidus, issued by Austrasia between 585 and 625, represents a crucial period of Merovingian rule. Under rulers like Childebert II, the Frankish kingdoms maintained a decentralized yet robust economic system. Continued minting of gold solidi, echoing late Roman and Byzantine traditions, highlights gold's enduring importance. The named moneyer, Landegisilus, underscores significant local autonomy of mints like Huy, reflecting the fragmented political landscape of early medieval Europe.

Artistry: The artistry of this solidus is characteristic of the Merovingian stylistic school, evolving from classical prototypes towards abstract and stylized forms. Landegisilus, as moneyer, likely oversaw engraving at the Huy mint. The obverse typically features a simplified, often anepigraphic bust, a distant echo of imperial Roman portraits. The reverse invariably displays a prominent cross, frequently surmounting steps. Legends, though often blundered, usually identify the mint (Huy) and moneyer, offering insight into decentralized minting practices.

Technical/Grading: From a technical perspective, Merovingian solidi often present grading challenges due to rudimentary minting techniques. High-points typically include prominent features of the obverse bust, such as the diadem or hair, and the central elements of the reverse cross. Strike quality is frequently irregular, with common issues including off-center strikes, weak areas, and irregular flan shapes. A well-struck example would exhibit a relatively full and centered design with legible, albeit often barbarized, legends.

×