Katalog
| İhraççı | Austrasia, Kingdom of |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 585-625 |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | 1 Solidus |
| Para birimi | Tremissis (476-670) |
| Bileşim | Gold |
| Ağırlık | 4.18 g |
| Çap | |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | Prou Mer#1199 , Delmonte G#20 , Belfort#1530 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Diademed bust right. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | Latin |
| Ön yüz lejandı |
CHOAE FIT (Translation: Minted in Huy.) |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Cross standing on globe. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Latin |
| Arka yüz lejandı |
LANDIGISILOS MO (Translation: Moneyer Landegisilus.) |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (585-625) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 7321840910 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Solidus, issued by Austrasia between 585 and 625, represents a crucial period of Merovingian rule. Under rulers like Childebert II, the Frankish kingdoms maintained a decentralized yet robust economic system. Continued minting of gold solidi, echoing late Roman and Byzantine traditions, highlights gold's enduring importance. The named moneyer, Landegisilus, underscores significant local autonomy of mints like Huy, reflecting the fragmented political landscape of early medieval Europe.
Artistry: The artistry of this solidus is characteristic of the Merovingian stylistic school, evolving from classical prototypes towards abstract and stylized forms. Landegisilus, as moneyer, likely oversaw engraving at the Huy mint. The obverse typically features a simplified, often anepigraphic bust, a distant echo of imperial Roman portraits. The reverse invariably displays a prominent cross, frequently surmounting steps. Legends, though often blundered, usually identify the mint (Huy) and moneyer, offering insight into decentralized minting practices.
Technical/Grading: From a technical perspective, Merovingian solidi often present grading challenges due to rudimentary minting techniques. High-points typically include prominent features of the obverse bust, such as the diadem or hair, and the central elements of the reverse cross. Strike quality is frequently irregular, with common issues including off-center strikes, weak areas, and irregular flan shapes. A well-struck example would exhibit a relatively full and centered design with legible, albeit often barbarized, legends.