Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Iceni tribe (Celtic Britain) |
|---|---|
| Year | 50 BC - 15 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 1.19 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Stylised Celtic female head facing right, rendered in the abstract La Tène artistic tradition characteristic of Icenian coinage. The effigy displays a sharply pointed nose and pronounced facial features, with a diadem depicted above the forehead. The hair is rendered as a series of flowing, flame-like curvilinear strands extending above and behind the head. The flan is irregular, and the design occupies the full field without inscription or border. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Iceni occupied territory across modern Norfolk and Suffolk, and their coinage production intensified markedly in the decades following Caesar's two British expeditions of 55–54 BC — not as a direct response to Rome, but as part of a broader monetization occurring across southeastern Britain's tribal networks. The Norfolk Diadem series sits within the earlier phase of Iceni silver output, before the tribe's coinage became more standardized under client-king arrangements with Rome.
The "cf." qualifiers across all four references signal genuine typological uncertainty — this piece shares characteristics with the established series without cleanly matching any single recorded die.