Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Silver Unit - Athenian style

Uitgever Sabaean Kingdom (Southern Arabia)
Jaar 300 BC - 100 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Ancient South Arabian
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A highly stylised owl stands upright facing right, its plumage rendered in bold relief with rows of pellets representing feathers across the body and wing, characteristic of South Arabian imitative coinage derived from the Athenian tetradrachm type. The head is shown in three-quarter view with large, prominent eyes. Beneath the owl appears a South Arabian monogram or inscription in the lower field. Additional Ancient South Arabian lettering is visible to the right of the owl, indicating local mint or dynastic attribution. The overall design is a schematised provincial adaptation of the classical Attic owl motif.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Sabaean merchants copied Athenian owl tetradrachms so faithfully that the imitations circulated alongside originals across Arabian trade routes for generations — the Athenian type had become a trusted commercial currency across the ancient Near East, and reproducing it was a commercial decision, not a cultural one. These pieces were struck to local weight standards rather than Attic, which is why they fall short of the canonical tetradrachm mass.

The Huth and CAF references document considerable die variety across the series, reflecting decentralized production over two centuries rather than any single mint event.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT