Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Siglos - Artaxerxes II / Artaxerxes III THE ROYAL COINAGE - 3rd type B - late

Uitgever Achaemenid Empire
Jaar 405 BC - 338 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Irregular incuse punch of oblong form divided into two or more rectangular compartments by raised ridges, a typical reverse type of Achaemenid hammered silver coinage produced by the punch die technique. The surface is uneven and striated, with no figurative design or inscriptions, consistent with the standard reverse treatment of the royal siglos series.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (405 BC - 338 BC) - -
ND (375 BC - 340 BC) - -
Aanvullende informatie

The royal siglos changed little over nearly a century of Achaemenid rule — deliberately so. Artaxerxes II inherited an empire shaken by the revolt of his brother Cyrus the Younger, whose Greek mercenary army nearly reached Babylon in 401 BC, and monetary conservatism was part of a broader effort to project continuity and stability. The 3rd type B siglos spans the reigns of two kings across 67 years, making precise attribution to either ruler essentially impossible without die study beyond what catalog references resolve.

Sigloi circulated widely in Anatolia and the Levant but were rarely seen in Persia proper, where commodity exchange dominated.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT