Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Siglos - Aristo...

Uitgever Paphos
Jaar 450 BC - 400 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Eagle depicted in full flight with wings fully spread, soaring to the left, rendered in fine relief within a recessed incuse square. The feather detailing on the wings and tail is carefully articulated, demonstrating accomplished die-cutting technique characteristic of late fifth-century Cypriot coinage. The incuse square border is clearly defined with a plain, undecorated frame.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Paphos
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Paphos, on Cyprus's southwestern coast, operated under a dynastic system of city-kings whose loyalty shifted between Persian overlords and Hellenic ambitions throughout the fifth century. The Siglos weight standard itself — borrowed from the Persian administrative system — reflects that ambivalence precisely: a Greek city minting in a Persian weight denomination, a quiet negotiation in metal between two worlds.

The truncated name "Aristo..." almost certainly refers to Aristokypros or a related dynast, though the fragmentary attribution has prompted disagreement among specialists since the BMC cataloging.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT