Katalog
| Emittent | Uncertain Cypriot city |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 515 BC - 485 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Siglos (1) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 10.52 g |
| Durchmesser | 20 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered, Incuse |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | GCV#3605 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Head of roaring lion right. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Goat`s head left in dotted square within incuse square. |
| Reversschrift | Cypriot |
| Reverslegende |
###to_edit### (Translation: E) |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (515 BC - 485 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1721973540 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Siglos, from an uncertain Cypriot city (515-485 BC), highlights Cyprus's complex position under Achaemenid Persian suzerainty. While nominally Persian, local city-kingdoms retained significant minting autonomy. Adopting the Persian Siglos weight standard (10.52g, a heavy or double Siglos) demonstrates strong Achaemenid economic influence. However, the very act of local coinage affirms these polities' self-governance, balancing Greek and Near Eastern spheres of power during the late Archaic period.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver, likely a skilled local die-sinker, operated within late Archaic artistic currents. Cypriot coinage of this era typically blends Greek archaic stiffness with indigenous iconography, occasionally incorporating Near Eastern elements. Though GCV#3605's specific design is unprovided, common motifs included local deities, sacred animals, or civic emblems. These were rendered with characteristic rigidity, strong outlines, and a monumental quality, reflecting the island's unique multicultural identity through an Archaic Greek lens.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this Siglos (GCV#3605) weighs 10.52 grams and measures 20 millimeters, consistent with a heavy or double Siglos standard. As common for early archaic issues, strike quality varies, with instances of off-centering, uneven flans, or areas of weakness. High-points—prominent features like hair, musculature, or intricate animal details—are usually the first to show wear. A strong strike reveals crisp details and full flan coverage; lesser examples may exhibit softness or partial strikes, impacting the overall grade. Metal purity was generally high.