Catalog
| Issuer | Ottoman Empire |
|---|---|
| Year | 1575 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 4.85 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central field occupied by a multi-line Arabic legend arranged within a rectangular cartouche, reading the royal titulature of Sultan Murad III. The inscription is executed in a bold, deeply struck thuluth-style script typical of Ottoman provincial hammered coinage. The legend proclaims the sultan as ruler of the two lands and sovereign of the two seas, followed by his name and regnal invocation. The flan is irregularly shaped and slightly broader than the die, with a plain, undecorated border. Strike quality is characteristic of mid-sixteenth-century Basra mint production. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | سلطان البرين وخاقان البحرين السلطان ابن السلطان مراد خان عز نصره |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Murad III's accession in 1574 brought immediate fiscal pressure: his father Selim II had left the treasury strained from the Cyprus campaign, and the new sultan faced mounting costs across the eastern frontier. The Basra mint, operating under Ottoman control since 1546, served the Gulf trade routes rather than imperial prestige — its output was functional currency for a commercially active region where Persian and Indian coin standards competed directly with Ottoman issues.
The Shahi denomination itself derives from Safavid monetary terminology, a pointed irony given the sustained Ottoman-Safavid rivalry over Mesopotamia throughout this period.