See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Sestertius - Rhoemetalces

Issuer Bosporan Kingdom
Year 131-154
Type Log in to see details
Value Sestertius (48)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Greek
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Standing figure of Nike (Victory) advancing left, wearing a flowing chiton, with wings spread behind her; she holds a wreath in her raised right hand and a palm branch in her left. The figure is rendered in the Hellenistic manner, with drapery animated by movement. The denomination mark MH (numerical value 48) is divided on either side of the figure, M to the left and H to the right, within a dotted border that encircles the entire design. The reverse type of Nike is consistent with other Bosporan royal bronze issues of the mid-second century AD.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Rhoemetalces ruled the Bosporan Kingdom as a client king under Roman suzerainty, his authority ultimately dependent on imperial goodwill from Rome. The Bosporan coinage of this period occupies an awkward monetary position — nominally independent issues from a kingdom that was, in practice, an extension of Roman frontier policy along the northern Black Sea coast. The regnal copper issues of this reign are catalogued across multiple reference systems precisely because no single authority has resolved the series convincingly, with Anokhin, MacDonald, and the Bosporos corpus each offering slightly divergent attributions for overlapping types.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE