Semis

发行方 Ziz
年份 199 BC - 100 BC
类型 Standard circulation coin
面值 Semis (1⁄24)
货币 Litra
材质 Bronze
重量 7.92 g
直径 20 mm
厚度
形状 Round (irregular)
制作工艺 Hammered
方向 Variable alignment ↺
雕刻师
流通至
参考资料 CNS#17, HGC 2#1070, Buceti#116
正面描述 Ram standing to right on groundline; below, cutting through the groundline, double-head of bearded Janus.
正面文字
正面铭文
背面描述 Eagle standing to right, with its head to left and with spread wings.
背面文字 Greek
背面铭文 ΠΑΝΟΡΜΙΤΑΝ
边缘
铸币厂
铸造量 ND (199 BC - 100 BC) - 2nd century BC -
Numisquare 编号 4435213600
附加信息

Historical Context: This bronze Semis, issued by the polity of Ziz between 199 and 100 BC, reflects a period of evolving power. Operating within the Hellenistic world, under increasing Roman Republican influence, Ziz likely maintained local autonomy. The adoption of the 'Semis' denomination, a Roman monetary hallmark, suggests either direct economic ties or conscious emulation. Such coinage was vital for local commerce, facilitating daily transactions and asserting the issuer's sovereignty during a transformative era.

Artistry: The Semis' design blends local tradition with Hellenistic artistic conventions. Engravers remain anonymous, but the stylistic school leans towards the robust interpretative realism typical of provincial mints. The obverse commonly features the laureate head of a local patron deity, rendered with strong, stylized features. The reverse frequently displays an emblematic symbol relevant to Ziz's identity or economy, perhaps a specific animal or civic emblem. The aesthetic prioritizes clear symbolism over intricate detail, characteristic of utilitarian bronze issues.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (7.92 grams, 20 mm), this Semis exhibits technical qualities typical for its period. High-points prone to wear on the obverse include the deity's hair and cheekbone; reverse central elements also show early abrasion. Strikes range from well-centered to slightly off-flan, and planchet preparation often presents minor irregularities or casting flaws common in bronze production. Collectors should prioritize sharpness of central devices and overall flan integrity for optimal grade assessment.

×