See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/3 Riksdaler - Gustav III Largesse money, Birth of Crownprince

Issuer Sweden
Year 1778
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) KM#M50
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A prominently rendered bound sheaf of wheat occupies the central field, its stalks fanning outward symmetrically above a neatly tied bundle. A horizontal line divides the field from the exergue below. The arc legend GLÄDER ÄN ET TIDEHVARF · curves around the upper rim, while the two-line exergual inscription reads FORTPLANTAD / 1778 ·, commemorating the birth of the Crown Prince and the propagation of the royal line.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering GLÄDER ÄN ET TIDEHVARF · _____________________ FORTPLANTAD 1778 ·
(Translation: Gladdens yet an era Propagated)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Gustav III ordered these pieces struck specifically for the ceremonial largesse — the scattering of coins among crowds — that accompanied the birth of his son and heir, the future Gustav IV Adolf, on November 1, 1778. The event carried unusual political weight: Gustav had seized autocratic power in his 1772 coup, and after six childless years of marriage, the birth of a male heir was used to reinforce dynastic legitimacy. Whispers at court, and later more openly, questioned whether the king — whose marriage was notoriously strained — was actually the child's father.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE