Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Sweden |
|---|---|
| Year | 1778 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | KM#M50 |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A prominently rendered bound sheaf of wheat occupies the central field, its stalks fanning outward symmetrically above a neatly tied bundle. A horizontal line divides the field from the exergue below. The arc legend GLÄDER ÄN ET TIDEHVARF · curves around the upper rim, while the two-line exergual inscription reads FORTPLANTAD / 1778 ·, commemorating the birth of the Crown Prince and the propagation of the royal line. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | GLÄDER ÄN ET TIDEHVARF · _____________________ FORTPLANTAD 1778 · (Translation: Gladdens yet an era Propagated) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Gustav III ordered these pieces struck specifically for the ceremonial largesse — the scattering of coins among crowds — that accompanied the birth of his son and heir, the future Gustav IV Adolf, on November 1, 1778. The event carried unusual political weight: Gustav had seized autocratic power in his 1772 coup, and after six childless years of marriage, the birth of a male heir was used to reinforce dynastic legitimacy. Whispers at court, and later more openly, questioned whether the king — whose marriage was notoriously strained — was actually the child's father.