Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Quinarius

Uitgever Uncertain Central European Celts (Uncertain Central and Eastern European Celts)
Jaar 65 BC - 30 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Celticized schematic male figure running right with head turned back to left, rendered in a highly abstracted La Tène artistic style. The figure holds a torc in the left hand and a serpent in the right hand, both attributes rendered in stylized linear form. The body is depicted with simplified, almost geometric limbs characteristic of Central European Celtic coinage of the late republican period.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The quinarius denomination was adopted by Celtic tribes across Central Europe not through invention but imitation — Roman quinarii circulating along trade routes became the template, then were progressively abstracted over generations of copying until the original imagery dissolved into pure geometric convention. This particular type sits at the end of that devolutionary chain, its origins traceable to prototypes circulating during the late Republican period when Roman commercial penetration of the Danubian and Rhineland zones was accelerating rapidly.

Attribution to a specific tribe remains contested. The overlapping Flesche, Castelin, and de La Tour references reflect decades of scholarly disagreement over workshop assignment.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT