Quattrino

Эмитент Masegra (Italian States)
Год 1600-1700
Тип Standard circulation coin
Номинал
Валюта
Состав Copper
Вес 0.67 g
Диаметр 11 mm
Толщина
Форма Round
Техника
Ориентация Medal alignment ↑↑
Гравёр(ы)
В обращении до
Каталожные номера MIR LOM#777, KM#2
Описание аверса Three-line inscription.
Письменность аверса Latin
Надписи аверса DI
BECCA
RIA
Описание реверса Three-line inscription.
Письменность реверса Latin
Надписи реверса 1
QVATRI
NO
Гурт
Монетный двор
Тираж ND (1600-1700)
ID Numisquare 8511567897
Дополнительная информация

Historical Context: This copper Quattrino originates from Masegra, a lordship within the strategic Valtellina valley of the Italian States, dating from the 17th century. This era saw the Valtellina as a critical corridor contested between the Spanish Habsburgs, the Grisons (Swiss Confederation), and various Italian powers. The issuance of such small denomination coinage reflects localized economic needs and the assertion of monetary authority amidst broader geopolitical struggles. These humble coins were the backbone of daily commerce for the local populace.

Artistry: The engraver for this diminutive issue remains anonymous, common for provincial copper coinage of the era. Stylistically, the Quattrino likely adheres to a simplified, utilitarian interpretation of late Renaissance or early Baroque numismatic design, characteristic of minor Italian states. The design would typically feature a basic local coat of arms, a simple cross, or a monogram, executed with rudimentary tools. Emphasis was on legibility and function rather than elaborate artistic detail, reflecting its role as a workhorse currency.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, often irregular copper flan (11 mm, 0.67 grams), this Quattrino typically exhibits a weak or uneven strike. High-points for wear or detail preservation would be the central elements, such as a shield's apex or a cross's center. Due to rapid production and softer metal, planchet imperfections, off-center strikes, and partial legends are common. Collectors should prioritize examples with clear central devices and as much legible legend as possible, recognizing the inherent technical limitations of these utilitarian issues.

×