目录
| 正面描述 | Diademed male head with lappets, to the left. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Greek |
| 正面铭文 | |
| 背面描述 | Prow with a shield on the side to right, dolphin below. |
| 背面文字 | Kharosthi |
| 背面铭文 | |
| 边缘 | |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (227 BC - 221 BC) - - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 4788121080 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This Quadruple Unit of Heliokles II, minted in Taxila between 90 and 75 BC, originates from a tumultuous period in the Indo-Greek kingdom. Heliokles II likely reigned over a fragmented portion of the former Hellenistic territories, facing constant pressure from Saka and Parthian incursions, alongside internal strife. His bronze coinage, particularly this substantial quadruple unit, reflects a localized effort to maintain economic stability and assert royal authority in a region experiencing significant political decentralization and the gradual decline of direct Greek rule. His reign represents one of the final chapters of Hellenistic influence in the Indian subcontinent.
Artistry: While specific engraver attribution is absent for this issue, the artistry belongs to the late Indo-Greek stylistic school. The design typically features a diademed or helmeted bust of Heliokles II on the obverse, rendered in a provincial Hellenistic style that, while retaining classical elements, often shows a simplification compared to earlier, more refined issues. The reverse would commonly depict a Greek deity or symbolic representation pertinent to the ruler's claim or local cults. Bronze coinage of this era often exhibits less meticulous execution than its silver counterparts, yet still conveys the regal authority and iconographic traditions of the Indo-Greek dynasty.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Quadruple Unit, weighing 10.18 grams, typically presents with characteristics common to late Indo-Greek bronze issues. High-points for strike and wear usually include the ruler's diadem, hair, and facial features on the obverse, and the attributes or drapery of any reverse deity. Planchet quality can vary, often showing irregular flans or minor casting flaws. Strikes are frequently off-center or exhibit areas of weakness, particularly towards the edges, due to inconsistent striking pressure and worn dies. A well-centered example with full details on both sides is considered exceptional for this type.