Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 42 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | RIC I#88, OCRE#ric.1(2).cl.88 |
| Obverse description | Central device depicting a modius (grain measure) resting on three legs, rendered in low relief against a plain field. The modius, symbolic of imperial generosity and the grain supply, is presented frontally and occupies the center of the flan. A Latin legend encircles the design along the periphery, partially visible on this heavily worn specimen. The hammered flan displays the characteristic irregular edge typical of early Imperial bronze coinage. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (42) |
| Additional information |
Claudius issued a series of anonymous quadrantes — bearing no imperial portrait or name — early in his reign, a deliberate archaism harking back to Republican-era small bronze coinage. The PON M TR P IMP COS II dating places this piece firmly in 42 AD, the year of the Camillus conspiracy, when a group of Dalmatian governors attempted to depose him. Whether the conservative, self-effacing character of these coins reflects genuine ideological posturing or simply administrative continuity from Caligula's mint practice remains debated.