See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Qirat - Ahmad ibn Hud

Issuer Uncertain Almoravid taifa
Year 1144-1145
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 1.7 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field occupied by multiple horizontal lines of Arabic Kufic-style inscription, arranged in four registers and reading religious and ruler titulature. The legends are bold and densely packed, consistent with Almoravid hammered coinage convention. A simple linear border encircles the inscribed field, with a beaded or dotted outer rim following the irregular flan edge. The overall composition is typical of late Almoravid fractional silver coinage attributed to the taifa period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1144-1145)
Additional information

Ahmad ibn Hud al-Mustansir briefly controlled Murcia and surrounding territories during the chaos that followed the Almoravid collapse, positioning himself as an independent ruler before the Almohad advance rendered such ambitions moot. His coinage is genuinely difficult to attribute with confidence — the political situation in al-Andalus between 1144 and 1147 produced a cluster of short-lived taifa rulers whose mint output overlaps in style and often in epigraphy.

The "uncertain Almoravid taifa" attribution reflects an unresolved scholarly debate, not cataloger caution.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE