See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Pulo - Vasily I Dmitriyevich Leopard left / Leopard right

Issuer Moscow, Grand principality of
Year 1413-1423
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description A stylized leopard passant depicted in left profile occupies the central field of this crudely struck hammered copper pulo. The feline figure is rendered in a primitive yet distinctive manner characteristic of early Muscovite coinage, with the tail raised and curled. A partial Cyrillic circular legend surrounds the device, of which only fragments remain legible on the flan.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering ...АТЬ...
(Translation: Seal.)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Vasily I spent much of his reign navigating the wreckage left by Timur's 1395 campaign, which had devastated the Golden Horde's commercial infrastructure and disrupted the tribute relationships that defined Muscovite political life. The pulo, a fractional copper piece, filled the lowest register of a money economy that was simultaneously absorbing Tatar monetary practices and reasserting Rus' coinage traditions.

HP II#1575 is one of several pulo types attributable to this reign by die study rather than any inscription — Vasily I's copper issues rarely carry legible authority marks, and attribution depends heavily on stylistic comparison within Hanaberg and Petrov's corpus.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE