See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Potin Unit Thurrock Degraded Head Variety

Issuer Uncertain tribe Brittonic (Celtic Britain)
Year 100 BC - 90 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Highly stylised and severely degraded bust facing right, representing a schematic human head derived ultimately from a Massaliot prototype. The facial features are reduced to abstract, barely legible relief elements, consistent with the progressive degeneration characteristic of the Thurrock series. The surrounding field is plain and uninscribed, with the casting flash and irregular flan edge typical of British potin production. No legend or border is present.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (100 BC - 90 BC) - Bull left. -
ND (100 BC - 90 BC) - Bull right. -
Additional information

Potin coinage in Britain was not locally invented — it arrived as a technology transfer from Gaulish tribes, most likely via the Thames estuary trading networks that connected southeastern Britain to the continent in the late Iron Age. The Thurrock type is among the earliest British potins, and the "degraded head" designation refers specifically to progressive die copying: each generation of dies was cut from a casting of the previous coin rather than from a master, compressing and distorting the design incrementally. Van Arsdell's numbering range of 1426–38 reflects that degradation sequence rather than distinct subtypes.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE