Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain tribe Brittonic (Celtic Britain) |
|---|---|
| Year | 100 BC - 90 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Highly stylised and severely degraded bust facing right, representing a schematic human head derived ultimately from a Massaliot prototype. The facial features are reduced to abstract, barely legible relief elements, consistent with the progressive degeneration characteristic of the Thurrock series. The surrounding field is plain and uninscribed, with the casting flash and irregular flan edge typical of British potin production. No legend or border is present. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (100 BC - 90 BC) - Bull left. - ND (100 BC - 90 BC) - Bull right. - |
| Additional information |
Potin coinage in Britain was not locally invented — it arrived as a technology transfer from Gaulish tribes, most likely via the Thames estuary trading networks that connected southeastern Britain to the continent in the late Iron Age. The Thurrock type is among the earliest British potins, and the "degraded head" designation refers specifically to progressive die copying: each generation of dies was cut from a casting of the previous coin rather than from a master, compressing and distorting the design incrementally. Van Arsdell's numbering range of 1426–38 reflects that degradation sequence rather than distinct subtypes.