Catálogo
| Descrição do anverso | Stylized head on the left with hair forming a triangle at the level of the ear. |
|---|---|
| Escrita do anverso | |
| Legenda do anverso | |
| Descrição do reverso | Horse walking to the left; letter Q above the back and symbol () between the legs, or only TOC inscription above the horse. |
| Escrita do reverso | Latin |
| Legenda do reverso | TOC |
| Bordo | |
| Casa da moeda | |
| Tiragem |
ND (58 BC - 50 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6010680300 |
| Informações adicionais |
Historical Context: This Potin TOC with horse small module coin was issued by the Sequani, a powerful Gallic tribe inhabiting the Jura region, during the tumultuous period of 58-50 BC. This timeframe directly coincides with Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul, a period of immense political and military upheaval. The Sequani, initially involved in alliances against the Aedui and later against Rome, issued this coinage to support their economy, facilitate trade, or perhaps pay auxiliaries amidst the escalating conflict, demonstrating their economic activity despite the Roman advance.
Artistry: Characteristic of Celtic numismatic art, this coin showcases a highly stylized aesthetic. While specific engravers are unknown, the design adheres to the distinct Gallic stylistic school, known for its abstract and dynamic reinterpretations of Mediterranean prototypes. The obverse likely features a stylized human head, possibly representing a local deity or chieftain, indicated by "TOC". The reverse displays a vigorously rendered horse, a ubiquitous and powerful symbol in Celtic culture, often depicted with elongated features and an energetic stance, even on this small module.
Technical/Grading: Cast from potin, a base metal alloy, this coin typically exhibits characteristics of its casting fabrication process. At 3.2 grams and 17 millimeters, it represents a small module within the Sequani series. High-points for preservation assessment include the stylized facial features and the horse's head, chest, and rump. Technical qualities to evaluate include the completeness of the cast, the presence of casting voids or porosity, and the overall centering of the design on the flan, varying with ancient production methods. Reference variations suggest minor design or execution differences.