Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Brunei |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1582-1828 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | 18 mm |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | سلطان د العال (The correct spelling would be: سلطان العادل) (Translation: The Just Sultan) |
| Reversbeschreibung | Two lines of Arabic legend enclosed within a beaded circle, reading مالك الظاهر (The Acknowledged Ruler). The inscription is centrally placed within the field, which exhibits the characteristic rough, porous surface associated with cast tin-lead pitis coinage of Brunei. The lettering, while simply rendered, follows the conventional epigraphic style found on Bruneian sultanate issues of the period. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The pitis was Brunei's primary small-change currency across more than two centuries of the Sultanate's commercial peak, circulating alongside Spanish and Dutch trade silver that never filtered down to everyday bazaar transactions. Tin-lead coinage of this type was cast rather than struck, a production method common across maritime Southeast Asia that accounts for the considerable variation in weight and surface quality seen across surviving specimens.
Singh's catalog remains the authoritative reference for Brunei pitis classification, though attribution within the series is complicated by the absence of consistent dating on the coins themselves — the broad 1582–1828 range reflects dynasty rather than a single issue.