Katalog
| Emittent | Duchy of Carinthia (Austrian States) |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1200-1230 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Full-length frontal effigy of a standing bishop in ecclesiastical vestments, holding a crozier in his right hand and a key in his left. The figure is rendered in a stylized Romanesque manner typical of early 13th-century Austrian bracteate-influenced coinage. A circular inscription runs between two concentric beaded or linear circles in the outer field. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Latin |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Friesacher Pfennige were struck by a rotating cast of ecclesiastical and secular lords across the broader Friesach network, making precise attribution notoriously difficult — the Peilenstein issues are among the least documented in the series. The type circulated extensively across the eastern Alpine trade routes and deep into the Balkans, where Friesach pennies became the dominant mercantile currency of the region through much of the thirteenth century, accepted far beyond any single issuer's political reach.
The CNA Cq15 designation reflects continued scholarly uncertainty; dies were shared, copied, and imitated so freely across mints that individual attribution often rests on minute stylistic differences rather than any explicit mint signature.