Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Zofingen, City of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1240-1281 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Uniface issue; the reverse presents the incuse mirror image of the obverse design, characteristic of medieval bracteate coinage struck on thin silver flans. The incuse impressions of the double Janus head above and the facing head of St. Mauritius below, along with traces of the abbreviated legend, are visible as recessed impressions within the plain silver surface. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Hartmann von Froburg held the countship of Zofingen during a period when the town was actively consolidating municipal privileges, and coinage rights were among the most jealously guarded of these. The Froburg dynasty itself was extinguished in the male line by 1367, making issues tied to named members of the family useful anchors for attribution within what is otherwise a poorly documented sequence of medieval Swiss bracteate-adjacent issues.
The dual HMZ references reflect genuine scholarly uncertainty about whether the two catalogue entries represent distinct dies or a single type with variant classification.