Catalogo
| Emittente | Bishopric of Geneva |
|---|---|
| Anno | 1031 |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valore | |
| Valuta | Denier (1019-1135) |
| Composizione | Silver |
| Peso | 0.63 g |
| Diametro | |
| Spessore | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Tecnica | Hammered |
| Orientamento | |
| Incisore/i | |
| In circolazione fino al | |
| Riferimento/i | HMZ 1#1-288a |
| Descrizione del dritto | Temple. |
|---|---|
| Scrittura del dritto | Latin |
| Legenda del dritto | + GENEVA CIVITAS |
| Descrizione del rovescio | Cross with dots in the fields. |
| Scrittura del rovescio | Latin |
| Legenda del rovescio | + AALGODVS EPssS |
| Bordo | |
| Zecca | |
| Tiratura |
ND (1031) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6083090990 |
| Informazioni aggiuntive |
Historical Context: This silver obole, issued in 1031, dates from the episcopate of Adalgodus II, Bishop of Geneva (1020-1033). His tenure marked a period of increasing temporal authority for the Bishopric within the Kingdom of Burgundy, which was integrated into the Holy Roman Empire in 1032. The issuance of coinage by Adalgodus II underscores the bishop's sovereign rights and Geneva's economic vitality, reflecting the significant power wielded by prince-bishops in the early 11th century.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, characteristic of early medieval numismatic production. Stylistically, the coin aligns with proto-Romanesque traditions, drawing on simplified forms from Carolingian and Ottonian precedents. Given its minute size, the design likely features highly stylized elements such as a prominent cross, a monogram, or an abstract motif, emphasizing symbolic representation over naturalistic detail for functional recognition.
Technical/Grading: Weighing a mere 0.63 grams, this silver obole typically exhibits characteristics of early medieval minting. High-points susceptible to wear include central elements of any cross or monogram, or the highest relief points of a stylized bust. Technical strike qualities often include irregular flans, off-center strikes, and varying degrees of weakness, particularly towards the edges, due to manual hammering and challenges of striking such a small, thin planchet. Planchet integrity and die wear are also critical grading considerations.